578
submitted 8 months ago by kinther@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 140 points 8 months ago

Before everyone gets down on non-dairy milk drinkers, remember that the government subsidizes the hell out of dairy milk production to make it cheaper in the first place.

[-] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 38 points 8 months ago

They subsidize soy, oats, and almonds too.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

Is that accurate?

I used to buy a lot of soy milk since I'm lactose intolerant and it was cheaper than milk a decade ago. But now it's nearly the same price or double for the same brand. And now I'm wondering if it's a Soy conspiracy.

[-] Knightfox@lemmy.one 26 points 8 months ago

Most farming is subsidized, the debate then is which one is subsidized more. A bit of a specious argument at the end of the day.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

Pretty easy answer, though, considering 2/3rds of crops are fed to cows and therefor the cost of creating dairy milk is much higher.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 13 points 8 months ago

Soy is heavily subsidized. It's the main crop in most Midwestern states, even more than corn.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago

80℅ of the world's soy market is animal feed.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 8 months ago

Yep, so a double subsidy for livestock. All farming is subsidized, which does have some value to keep farms producing an excess for times of need, but the amount of subsidies for some industries is insane. Republicans will talk about the free market and then advocate for socialized farming to buy votes, because they don't actually care about logic or consistency. The same is true for coal and other forms of dirty energy that should be stomped out either by the market by now or by reasonable regulations, but instead we've kept them going with taxpayer money.

[-] Rbnsft@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Isnt most soy used as animal feed tho? Or is it only from certain regions?

[-] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It's a capitalist conspiracy.

[-] reassure6869@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

More to the relevant point, those alt milks are still cheaper to produce and Starbucks has the scale to do so. You know what it takes to make oatmilk? Oats, sugar, water, small amount of oil. Almond milk? Replace oat with almond, except you can use more of the material.

[-] nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

In oatmilk the sugar and oil are optional ingredients for taste and texture. Almost all oatmilk brands contain salt for taste.

I've only found one brand that uses three ingredients, oat water salt. They charge a premium for it, but it's the best tasting one I've found.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 months ago

Yep. I would LOVE to be able to consume dairy without shitting my guts out, but as that's not an option I get to either pay extra or go without.

[-] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

I think I'd rather get down with the sickness. (Because I'm lactose intolerant)

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Right? I would love to see a future where the right wing gets their way and makes calling almond milk "milk" illegal, but is also forced to stop subsidizing cow excretions. Do I buy the Authentic Cow Milk for $10 a gallon, or the Almond-Based Dairy Alternative for $6...?

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
578 points (96.0% liked)

News

23388 readers
1510 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS