184

rule of vpn customers but it's not misinformation this time (lemmy.cafe)

submitted 7 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

source (im aware it’s weird and corporate but it’s at least actual market research and better than random made up data)

no hate to OOP, do not harrass them, but it was a bit weird to post literally made up data like it was truth lolol

other cool things:

Countries where VPNs are illegal or restricted.

Countries with the Highest VPN Adoption Rate

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] lattenwald@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

I live in Russia and with all this "VPN is restricted" fuss I've yet to meet someone without VPN on their phone. Most people use free VPN services, some are paying for it, me and my friends use VPN we set up on VPS.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 11 points 7 months ago

my understanding is that the restrictions are on the VPN providers themselves, not the individual user. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41829726

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

They have black boxes on ISPs that listen to traffic and can restrict things, and they manually block popular VPNs' IPs and protocols. Most free ones don't work, but new, rare and paid ones still do.

[-] lattenwald@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wireguard protocol works with my home internet provider, doesn't work on LTE. Shadowsocks just works everywhere.

They do have black boxes but there are protocols they can't handle yet. It's just usual sword vs shield arms race.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Yes, there's a lag between different networks and public wifis. Seems like some blocks are implemented by ISPs themselves however fast they are at this.

Hope they take this sword as a didlo while we shield our freedom of information and privacy.