289
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
289 points (96.8% liked)
politics
19148 readers
2042 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
His own National Security Advisor speaks against him. That should normally raise a lot of red flags.
Anybody who hasn't already seen the dozens of red flags isn't going to care about one more.
What if most of the red flags are not real or manufactured, and the other side has just as many red flags?
They aren't and they don't.
The funny part is that if you actually engaged with what I am saying, you would list a bunch of things that are either completely false or exaggerations or just different opinions. The issue is that you are being lied to and your sources of news suck.
The funny part is that actually engaging a bad faith troll is a waste of my time. You did kind of prove my point though, so thanks for that.
That is all you guys do is insult and say nothing of substance. Hopefully you will see the error of you ways before the country is destroyed, but probably not.
And all you've done is ask some bullshit hypothetical question about "both sides". Don't start crying about how that deserves a fully researched response with citations. It got exactly the response it deserved.
If you want to destroy the country, the convicted fraudster and rapist who promised to be a dictator on day one is a sure-fire way to do it.
Okay good, you actually made a claim "convicted fraudster and rapist". He was not convicted of rape, and the fraud he was convicted of was complete and obvious bullshit to anyone that knows thing one about real estate.
I am telling you, trump was not a good president, but all the things you believe are based on bullshit.
The judge in the Jean Carroll case disagrees with you. But I'm sure you know better than him. It's also not ok to penetrate someone against their will, even if you don't use your dick.
Owing $400M is bad from a security/blackmail point of view even if you're apparently cool with all the fraud. Would you prefer to discuss the scam University or the charity that was shut down for misuse of funds?
You also didn't address him being a dictator on day one, so I guess you're ok with that.
Hand-waving away documented crimes and established facts is really just further proving my point about not seeing red flags.
I do know better than him about real estate, that is true, but he would be better at law. But its a political prosecution not a protection one. And the rest of your comment is just standard leftist propaganda; trump makes a joke and you pretend its real.
I thought we were talking about trump not biden... I bet you dont even know about that one.
Hahahahahaha