53
Even Mentioning “Occupation” at the Oscars Is Antisemitic, Some Jewish Hollywood Figures Say (theintercept.com)
submitted 8 months ago by aleph@lemm.ee to c/israel_palestine_pol@lemmy.world
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“The use of words like ‘occupation’ to describe an indigenous Jewish people defending a homeland that dates back thousands of years and has been recognized as a state by the United Nations, distorts history” gets the prize for the most oblivious statement I've seen all week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're absolutely right.

I'm old enough to have been in college in the aftermath of 9-11 and the build up to the second US-Iraq war and distinctly remember that nothing was able to still the beating of the war drums - not journalists calling out the "dodgy dossier" from UK intelligence that supposedly provided proof of WMDs, not a million anti-war protesters marching in the streets against the US/UK contravening the UN to invade Iraq. The government went ahead anyway, backed by a significant proportion of the media.

The feeling of futility with the current situation in Gaza is all too familiar.

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
53 points (89.6% liked)

Israel and Palestine Politics Discussion

312 readers
5 users here now

The sole purpose of this community is to discuss Israeli and Palestinian issues. It is not the place for hurling insults, rehashing grudges, or making up history. Any conversation that veers into the "if only your people had" realm will be deleted or locked right away. I started this community in the potentially fruitless hope that we may have a civil conversation about this issue.

Rules:

  1. References to historical events must include a reputable source. The definition of reputable is up to the mods. Keep that in mind.
  2. Articles from reputable sources only.
  3. No name-calling. That's what DMs are for. /s
  4. Keep it in English. If I don't understand the word, it gets removed. Obvious exceptions would be the use of proper names and references. For example, "wadi" when used to refer to a place is acceptable.
  5. Discussions that are heading into the probability of becoming a flame war will be locked.
  6. Repeat offenders will be forced to find another community.
  7. Anti-Zionism is ok. Anti-Semitism is not.
  8. Whataboutism is for toddlers. Try to grow up.
  9. Posting articles about current events is encouraged. Posting the same story from 20 different sources is not.
  10. Posting an article purely for the purpose of saying "Look what monsters they are" is discouraged unless it can generate an honest discussion. This is probably the most difficult rule to follow.
  11. No calling anyone a terrorist.
  12. No YouTube links. Some of us can read.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
DevCat@lemmy.world