103
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Looks like there will be a need for another fork 😒

Looks like this will be it: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Are all these wacky licenses because the OSI doesn't have an AGPL (ostensibly anti-cloud) equivalent BSD style permissive license?

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

The ostensible point is to prevent resellers from platforming your code. SSPL is an answer to, say, AWS offering your product much cheaper than you can. RSAL seems to be Redis spinning their own SSPL, BSL, whatever bullshit license because they’re not happy with the existing faux open source cloud licenses that prevent platforming.

There really isn’t a good way to handle this from an open source perspective. Cloud majors can and will undercut the fuck out of anyone to establish dominance. Ideally you’re providing a better support experience or working with them (until they decide to kneecap you) to maintain your business. Previously Redis had an paid tier that had functionality not available at the OSS level. I think that’s also legit.

I personally loathe the compliance issues these random shitty fucking licenses throw and don’t think trying to claw back business from majors is the right approach. The little guy is going to follow the path of least resistance which means you’ve made your software enterprise only.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
103 points (96.4% liked)

Open Source

31217 readers
211 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS