889
Sounds familiar? (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 53 points 8 months ago

The answer is you already have the 40k person, it’s not broken, there’s no urgency for HR to approve additional funding.

That person says they’re leaving, now HR can approve a counter offer, but also, can you trust they won’t leave later? Maybe we shouldn’t.

You’ve failed to give a raise and they’ve now left. Now there’s a gap and the team can’t pick up the slack. Oh shit, guess we better hire someone else. Oh, the market average rate we all pay the same company to provide says the rate is higher than 4 years ago, so they get hired with the higher rate.

Isn’t that unfair to the existing employees? We’ll see point 1. It ain’t broke, we can’t approve more funding.

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

This is why the idea of maintenance is something that should be better appreciated. If that person's pay kept up in the first place, an employee can expect to not need to find another job and the problem never appears in the first place.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Shitty companies will never care about things which can’t go on a spreadsheet or entry in their earnings report.

But I agree.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
889 points (99.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5756 readers
201 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS