1420
submitted 1 year ago by sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WaffleFriends@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Can someone explain to me the google API and DRM situation in stupid people terms? I’m stupidly tech illiterate but I know that this is a big deal and I would like to understand

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 94 points 1 year ago

Sure thing. With this current proposal, when you visit a website, the site asks your browser if you're willing to display it as intended, basically with all and any adverts. If the answer is no, then you can't see the content, if the answer is yes, then you're likely using Chrome or a Chromium based browser and Google can guarantee more ad impressions, because they're first and foremost an advert selling company.

[-] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Why can't your browser lie and say "yes of course I'm displaying everything my fingers definitely aren't crossed behind my back"?

[-] DrQuint@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Because it's not just going to say yes. It's going to say yes, and then present an unique key that browser made for themselves. Other browsers might be able to spoof the key, but the proposal might have cryptographically expensive to even try.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1420 points (99.0% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
215 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS