1210

you don't need consumerism or mass media to be happy (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 years ago by stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net

208 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 78 points 2 years ago

I don't disagree, just a quite reminder that not everyone can afford this. The meme doesn't say it but it gives "money doesn't buy happiness" vibes and while this isn't false, a certain amount of money is required for this.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the picture, but I thought that's why they were called luxuries - because not everyone gets to have them. Though they aren't what we usually associate with a luxurious lifestyle.

E: just to be clear, everyone should have them, but many are too occupied with the daily battle for survival.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 years ago

Yes, I read it the same way, that's why I said that I don't disagree. Still there is this other reading I wanted to "debunk"

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago

Re-reading your comment I see that I must have meant to reply to someone else. I apologise, my social media timer sometimes makes me hasty.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah this is lowkey a boogie meme - the majority of people don't live in a work situation that allows for day naps!

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago

How do we call something that the majority of people can't afford ?

A luxury

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We call it expensive, which is a subtlety that the title of this meme poopooing on "consumerism" is missing out on.

Hence, a boogie meme. Those of us down here in the dirt don't have time for these luxuries; we consume imitations.

[-] CbtB@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago

You're in solarpunk territory. They want to rid us of money entirely. Sounds pretty nice but requires huge cultural and lifestyle changes.

[+] Vent@lemm.ee -13 points 2 years ago

How much money does one need for a long walk and listening to birds?

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 54 points 2 years ago

Time is money. If you work 2 jobs to provide for your kids alone, good luck finding the time and headspace to not worry about anything.
Parks and forests aren't evenly distributed. Not everyone can afford living near one or going there.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In capitalism, one must first pay for basic necessities like food and shelter before anything else. For some people who make low wages this requires an amount of time and effort that interferes with their leisure time.

That said, there are also some people who think they are in this category when in reality their stress is due to self-imposed standards of living that are higher than necessary. Or anxiety and other psychological problems that could be addressed through non-material strategies.

[-] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

there are also some people who think they are in this category when in reality their stress is due to self-imposed standards of living that are higher than necessary. Or anxiety and other psychological problems that could be addressed through non-material strategies.

also encouraged and exacerbated by capitalism (the former - to create the illusion of a "middle class" for people to aspire to and vote against their own actual material conditions, the latter - by commodifying health care and pathologizing anything that harms "productivity")

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How much money does one need to not have to choose between spending their evenings on a long walk listening to birds vs delivering pizzas as a third job to avoid eviction?