552
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a "rising tide of hatred".

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X on the day the new legislation came into force.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 198 points 1 year ago

OR, and hear me out, you could just not be a total asshole? Maybe have a baseline of tolerance and respect for the people who made you a billionaire? No? Then fuck right off and accept the consequences of your hatred.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago

It seems billionaires have really wacked out midlife crises. Instead of buying expensive cars and cheating on their partners, they come out as terfy nazis, build hate platforms, and crash companies. I mean to be fair, at this point the sample size is only two, JKKK Rowling and Musk, but it's still surprising that it'd happen twice.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 81 points 1 year ago

Bill Gates started a charity.

Steve Jobs killed himself because he thought he knew better than his doctors. Well, that's wacked out too, but at least it's not being a Nazi...

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago
[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago
[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

McAfee is not worth cracking

[-] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

That dude's videos are extraordinary.

[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

At last this guy was entertaining, not only disgusting like these modern "billionaires". Pff.

John McAfee’s poop hammock is perhaps the best story about him.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bill gates didn’t start the charity as a midlife crisis.

It’s a tax dodge and a lot of other ways of protecting his money while also doing a little reputation washing/ morality banking

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

Wasn't he 45 when he started the charity? That sounds like a perfect candidate to be a midlife crisis, haha

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Just because it was midlife doesn’t mean it’s a crisis.

He started the charity as a shelter for his obscene wealth. That is all.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

I'm not obscenely wealthy, so I don't have the experience...but it seems plausible that a billionaire midlife crisis could be "Where am I going to put this ridiculous amount of money that I've earned through less-than-ethical means?"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

I mean, the main motivator for the endowment was always Malinda Gates. I'm sure it functions as a tax shelter, but I doubt that was really the main motivator. He's already given over several times what his tax burden would have been, and if we compare it to other NGOs whose sole purpose is truly preserving or raising money, they really aren't comparable.

I'm in agreement that no one should have hundreds of millions of dollars, let alone billions. We can discuss the validity of NGO as a concept, but as far as NGO go, the gates foundation has done more actual aid work for 3rd world countries than most governments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't say that

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It’s a tax dodge

Have you ever worked with the Gates foundation? Because calling it a "tax dodge" like that is completely baseless, they're a really reallyngood charity, like honestly one of the best in the world, and also that's very ignorant of how taxes work.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Hobbes@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All that may be true, but it does a lot of good too.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Steve Jobs killed himself because he thought he knew better than his doctors. Well, that’s wacked out too, but at least it’s not being a Nazi…

Steve Jobs was always a piece of shit, and he had that diet well before he got cancer. But yeah the fact he continued to double down in the face of death shows how much of a narcissist he was.

[-] thyme@leminal.space 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think a factor with some of them, probably both the ones you mentioned, is that they can't handle criticism. So when they get any push back they double down. Then they get drawn into conservative nonsense that reinforces their beliefs. Then it's a downward spiral as they get radicalized far beyond their original positions.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

To be fair, you just described my mother to a tee. She’s a narcissist and has managed to alienate everyone from her life.

[-] OwlHamster@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You can add Markus Persson to that sample group

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (22 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
552 points (94.7% liked)

News

29900 readers
1913 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS