234
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 17 points 7 months ago

Probably some games did after the home rental market got started, but a lot of older games were difficult specifically to extend the experience. Cartridge storage was small, so if it was too easy you'd get through all 10 levels in less than a day and then feel like you hadn't got very much for your money.

[-] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Well I guess I am just wondering how more rentals from a video store would benefit the developers financially? I mean I’m sure I could research but surely game studios didn’t get any kind of percentage from the rental places based on how many times a title was rented right?

[-] xyzzy@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

They didn't want you to rent it multiple times. They wanted you to rent it once, be unable to beat it, but be intrigued enough that you purchased the game from a store. If you could play and beat a game in a single rental, there was little incentive to buy it (so the developers thought, and I imagine had some data to back it up).

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago

More rentals = more demand = more copies purchased by rental stores (I can't rent you the game you want if someone else has it right now).

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
234 points (97.2% liked)

RetroGaming

19629 readers
108 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS