22
Is nuclear energy the answer? Probably not
(www.theclimatebrink.com)
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
The author is vastly underestimating the problem caused by intermittency. He just slap $600 of batteries and consider it not intermittent anymore.
It's way more complicated than that.
First is the batteries, how much batteries? Enough to cover the night, one cloudy day, two ?
Then what do you do about winter ? Solar is producing 2-3 times more in summer than in winter, however we use generally not electricity in winter. So do we oversized the solar installation so it still producing enough for winter or do we plan backups ? What kind of backups? We have hydroelectricity and wood, but again if we need to build more wood burning power station it has a cost. Same thing with oversizing the solar installation.
I'm not saying that against renewables energy, I definitely the way to go.
However saying that a kWh of solar/wind is xxx cheaper is misleading.
Yes it's true that producing a kWh of renewable energy is cheap, however producing a kWh of renewable energy when we need it is way more expensive and it needs to be taken into consideration!