436
submitted 7 months ago by ElCanut@jlai.lu to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 28 points 7 months ago

37 is my favorite, because 3x7x37=777 (three sevens), and I think that's neat.

[-] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago

Wrong. Two hints:

7x7=9 at the end, not 7.

30x30=900, already more than 777.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 28 points 7 months ago

One hint: 3x7=21, 21x37=777.

When in doubt, use a calculator.

[-] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 7 months ago

Oh I am sorry. I did not see the x sign between 3 and 7. Lol.

[-] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 7 months ago

? My calculator definitely thinks that 3x7x37=777. Did you read it as 37x37 instead?

[-] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 months ago

Yes. Thanks. Sorry.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 5 points 7 months ago

You don’t even need a calculator for a quick calculation, take the closest value of 10: 3x7=21x37 or easier 20x40 = 800 which is close to the actual number, 777.

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
436 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37758 readers
681 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS