I also liked this bit:

[Reporter] But again, you think that’s unfair because of who your mom is. Because she suffers. Something about her suffering catalyzed in you the desire to end suffering in other people. Does that make sense?

No, that doesn’t make sense. Unfortunately, not all disease is genetic. There will still be disease and suffering. We are not that much of an optimistic fantasy.

Like she knows it's partly optimistic fantasy that will eventually work if she just keeps it going, but let it slip. E. Holmes thought the same thing... just a little more time and we'll have it.

I'm very glad I found the link to read the full article. She really does come off just like Elizabeth Holmes. When there isn't a viable product to sell, you really have to sell yourself. There are plenty female tech CEOs that stay out of the media, just like the majority don't know the names of most male tech CEOs, besides the few largest.

The way she reacted to the question of "your company is basically using exactly the same style of claimed technology as Theranos" as "Ugh. You're a meanie. Women shouldn't only be slaves!" is really quite telling.