449
O.J. Simpson, former football star acquitted of murder, dies at 76.
(abcnews.go.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
449 points (97.3% liked)
News
37850 readers
716 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Just out of curiosity then.. do you have a point in posting that link? Are you trying to say you think I'm just a troll? You're not really explaining yourself well which... Well.. makes sense.
Edit- also... You posted the exact same link twice as if they were different things? Was that like... Artistic expression?
No I copy and pasted the link that's the little chain symbol next to the comments. I'm assuming those links point directly to the individual comment that the links appears next to.
Swing and a miss pal.
Not trying to win an Internet argument.
No... You're just going out of your way to start one and then for some strange reason spamming the same link without elaborating why.
I stand by what I've said. Have a good day.
Dude, to be frank, you're very upset, and you're being rude, and its not worth having a conversation with you right now.
For what it's worth, I wasn't attacking you at all for anything, I only thing I was trying to do was defend the fact that the original comment was ambiguitous and could have been satire or literal/real, because people were giving me a hard time for not detecting the satire.
My comments are straightforward, and I stand by what I've said in them, and nothing more than that.
Still doubling down on claiming it was ambiguous. You can just admit you missed an extremely extremely obvious joke and then got lippy about it. And then for some reason decided to link some post. Twice.
What it really boils down to is.... If you don't like people talking to you like this.... Don't go through life being lippy.
I stand by what I've said. Have a good day.