1001
submitted 5 months ago by ugjka@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 49 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't know what you think neoliberal means, but it's not progressive. It's about subsuming all of society to the logic of the market, aka full privatisation. Every US president since Reagan has been neoliberal.

They will support fascist governments because they oppose socialists, and in fact the term "privatisation" was coined to describe the economic practices of the Nazis. The first neoliberal experiment was in Pinochet's Chile, where the US supported his coup and bloody reign of fascist terror. Also look at the US's support for Israel in the present day. This aspect of neoliberalism is in effect the process of outsourcing fascist violence overseas so as to exploit other countries whilst preventing the negative blowback from such violence at home.

Progressive ideas don't come from neoliberals, or even from liberals. Any layperson who calls themself a liberal at this point is unwittingly supporting neoliberalism.

The ideas of equality, solidarity, intersectionality, anticolonialism and all that good stuff come from socialists and anarchists, and neoliberals simply coopt them as political cover. This is part of how they mitigate the political fallout of supporting fascists. It's like Biden telling Netanyahu, "Hey now, Jack, cut that out! Also here's billions of dollars for military spending."

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago
[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Amen. I've seen so many anglocentric lemmy users conflate "classical liberalism" and "neoliberalism" as liberal while such are actually functionally the opposite to the idea. Ideologies under the capitalist umbrella limit freedoms and liberties to apply only for the upper echelon

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

It's America-specific, not anglocentric. Elsewhere doesn't do the whole "liberal means left wing" thing.

Liberal here at least generally refers to market and social liberalisation - i.e. simultaneously pro-free market and socially liberal.

The Liberal Democrats (amusingly a name that would trigger US Republicans to an extreme degree) in the UK, for example, sided with the Conservative (right wing) party, and when Labour (left/left of centre) was under its previous leader, they said they'd do the same again, because economically they're far more aligned with the Conservatives. But they also pushed for things like LGBT rights, because they're actual liberals.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah I thought that was the gist of my comment but maybe I didn't clarify enough. The right-wing appropriation of a "liberal" market is the oxymoron as it creates a hierarchy where less money = less liberty

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

Internet political terminology confuses me greatly. There are so many conflicting arguments over the meaning that I have lost all understand of what I am supposed to be. In the politics of the country I live in we refer political thinking into just left or right and nothing else, so adapting is made much more complex.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
1001 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58164 readers
4518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS