207

Squatters take over Gordon Ramsay hotel and pub in London (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 7 months ago by juicy@lemmy.today to c/world@lemmy.world

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 38 points 7 months ago

I'd say its a lot less bullshit than having empty spaces while people are homeless.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

It's a restaurant, not exactly set up for accommodation.

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 15 points 7 months ago

You're right of course, but the general point stands. Why can they squat in there if its used at all and not just collecting dust?

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Largely because squatters usually trash and destroy any property they squat in, or at best leave it full of litter.

Very few actually take any care of the property whatsoever.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Citation needed. As someone who has lived in pretty well kept squats in the Netherlands, I wonder wtf bubble you are in

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Interesting. The title says hotel

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

The British are weird with names.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024

207 points (96.4% liked)

World News

39050 readers

1133 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.