513
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

It is a scenario playing out nationwide. From Oregon to Pennsylvania, hundreds of communities have in recent years either stopped adding fluoride to their water supplies or voted to prevent its addition. Supporters of such bans argue that people should be given the freedom of choice. The broad availability of over-the-counter dental products containing the mineral makes it no longer necessary to add to public water supplies, they say. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that while store-bought products reduce tooth decay, the greatest protection comes when they are used in combination with water fluoridation.

The outcome of an ongoing federal case in California could force the Environmental Protection Agency to create a rule regulating or banning the use of fluoride in drinking water nationwide. In the meantime, the trend is raising alarm bells for public health researchers who worry that, much like vaccines, fluoride may have become a victim of its own success.

The CDC maintains that community water fluoridation is not only safe and effective but also yields significant cost savings in dental treatment. Public health officials say removing fluoride could be particularly harmful to low-income families — for whom drinking water may be the only source of preventive dental care.

“If you have to go out and get care on your own, it’s a whole different ballgame,” said Myron Allukian Jr., a dentist and past president of the American Public Health Association. Millions of people have lived with fluoridated water for years, “and we’ve had no major health problems,” he said. “It’s much easier to prevent a disease than to treat it.”

According to the anti-fluoride group Fluoride Action Network, since 2010, over 240 communities around the world have removed fluoride from their drinking water or decided not to add it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Liz@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

Sorry, you're right, I was a bit... hyperbolic. You can drink it every day without problems since 1) it's not as pure as we like to think it is and 2) you can easily get all your minerals and stuff from your food.

The danger is if you decide to chug a bunch of water for one reason or another. It's easier to give yourself water intoxication with distilled water, essentially because the osmotic pressure is so much higher relative to the inside of your cells. This isn't actually a problem most people have to worry about, water intoxication is pretty rare, but I'm used to thinking in terms of hardcore athletes. It would be foolish to drink only distilled water for a marathon, for example.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

That all sounds about right, appreciate your candor.

After 25 years, just this last year I started getting rib cramps which I suspect are a mineral (electrolyte) deficiency caused by distilled water (+ bad diet of UPF), so it's not necessarily completely without problems if your diet sucks. I started taking a mineral supplement and the cramps went away.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

You drink distilled water, which causes you issues you have to remedy by taking additional supplements.

Clearly your stance is not viable for general populations. You sound like people that don't want to allow blood transfusions because it makes them feel icky and fringe cases exist of it going poorly.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Did I say distilled water should be what the general population drinks? Did I say we should replace tap water with distilled water?

My mineral deficiency is due to a bad diet of primarily ultra-processed food and maybe exacerbated by nearly 3 decades of distilled water consumption. Oh, and it was cramps, fluoride causes brain damage.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Someone who gives themselves mineral deficiencies should absolutely not be listened to when it comes to general public health issues lol

Fluoride in the doses allowed in water doesn't cause brain damage, you sound like an anti-vaxxer.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

So you're making 100% perfect health choices and we should listen to you?

By drinking distilled water I've avoided lots of pollutants including fluoride.

Fluoride in the doses allowed in water doesn’t cause brain damage,

And how do you know what doses people are getting?

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

And how do you know what doses people are getting?

Lol just like an anti-vaxxer. Where's your evidence of water having dangerous doses exceeding regulations or what exceeding the levels the utility says they use? Bonus points if you're able to find levels that exceed what's actually safe for humans.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Where’s your evidence of water having dangerous doses

Why should I have to provide evidence of dangerous doses of drugs in my tap water. Don't add drugs to tap water.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Lmfao because it's not dangerous! We've done it for decades to tens if not hundreds of millions of people, with no negative effects. And we have proven medical benefits.

Just because at stronger doses than we use in drinking water can cause problems doesn't mean we shouldn't use it, that logic would apply to anything, salt, sugar, caffeine, etc.

Just because you get scared of things you don't understand doesn't mean you should dictate what other people get to do, ya goofball. Read a book sometime.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Don't put drugs in tap water, safety profile doesn't matter.

Vitamin C is safe, should we add that? Should we add every safe beneficial substance?

There are better ways to medicate people than dosing the tap water.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
513 points (98.7% liked)

News

35714 readers
744 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS