Anthony Albanese has praised a lone police officer who pursued a man on a stabbing spree through a shopping mall, saying ‘there is no doubt that she saved lives through her action’ (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 7 months ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/australia@aussie.zone

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The senior officer, Amy Scott, was conducting routine duties nearby when she was directed to head to Westfield shopping centre following reports a man was using a “massive” knife to stab shoppers.

Within minutes, the officer was inside the centre and began chasing the offender.

“This all happened very, very quickly,” the deputy commissioner of police, Tony Cooke, said.

“The officer was in the near vicinity, attended on her own, was guided to the location of the offender by people who were in the centre and she took the actions that she did, saving a range of people’s lives.”

Albanese thanked the officer, other police, first responders and the “everyday people” who reacted to help victims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A pity she wasn't carrying a taser. Why are guns standard issue but not tasers?

If the guy survived we might have discovered he has secretly killed others in the past.

We also might have discovered his motive but I dunno how useful that would be.

[-] Bangeo@aussie.zone 5 points 7 months ago

I believe in this case it wouldnt have made a difference. The officer would and should have chosen lethal force even if they had a taser. There is a greater chance of a failure with a taser vs a handgun and faced with a murderer with a machete? It would be foolish to take that chance.

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

He had a machete? I suppose that can be thrown so I accept your point if true.

How accurately does a taser need to be pointed? Can it be easily held in the officer's weak hand while the gun is held in the dominant hand?

[-] Bangeo@aussie.zone 2 points 7 months ago

according to google tasers have around a 40% failure rate. They are fairly close range and the prongs need to actually stick into the target to neutralise them. I believe officers are taught to use two hands for firing their gun so they most likely pick a taser or pistol not both.

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks for looking it up and summarising.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024

60 points (96.9% liked)

Australia

3579 readers

119 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Fluid@aussie.zone

bestusername@aussie.zone

eatham@aussie.zone