889
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Exactly. We have ~50% saying that now, whoch is why I think an anarchist society on a large scale isn't feasible to transition to anytime within the next few decades at least.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago

There's years in which nothing happens, and then there's weeks in which years happen. Don't underestimate how quickly radicalization can happen.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Historically, most revolutions have been a new upper class replacing an old one.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah well we're not trying to do that, so 🤷‍♂️

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Who's "we"? <1% of the population? Good luck enforcing your views, we can't even enforce democracy with a majority (debatably) that believes in it.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

An anarchist revolution won't happen until we have enough people doing anarchist praxis anyway. My point is that material circumstances quickly radicalize people. I don't necessarily think there's much hope for the US to avoid civil war at this point, but in any case if the radicalization happens to be towards anarchist praxis, then you won't get another leader on top.

I don't know what you tell you mate, I don't have an answer to your nihilism. Either perform and agitate for an anarchist praxis to avoid a new dictator, or passively vote and wait for the inevitable fascist decent. It's your choice in the end.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

First paragraph: Agree, except I believe anarchism is unstable and will lead to another leader eventually anyways.

Second paragraph: That's a false choice and you know it. There are so many possibilities for political organization-- see, for example, every country in the world. I'm not interested in arguing with someone who makes bad faith arguments like this.

See also:

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

I'm not arguing in bad faith, nor am I passively waiting for "society to collapse". You project your own behavior onto me and then complain about it.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I'm sure if you take a moment to analyze your behavior in this thread with an unbiased view, you'll come to agree with me. If you cannot do that, you should learn how-- not a dig, it's unironically very useful for finding holes in your views.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

So then the social order we get depends more on economic forces than it does on what the majority wants.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It's a bit of both

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
889 points (90.4% liked)

Lefty Memes

4354 readers
423 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS