168

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1779885123363635572.html

Buried in the Section 702 reauthorization bill (RISAA) passed by the House on Friday is the biggest expansion of domestic surveillance since the Patriot Act. Senator Wyden calls this power “terrifying,” and he’s right.

This bill represents one of the most dramatic and terrifying expansions of government surveillance authority in history. I will do everything in my power to stop it from passing in the Senate.

NEW: House votes 273-147 to extend FISA Section 702 surveillance powers for two years.
After rejecting an amendment to bolster warrant requirement when spying involves US persons.
126 Rs and 147 Ds voted for the bill.
Now to Senate.
Deadline: April 19

If the bill becomes law, any company or individual that provides ANY service whatsoever may be forced to assist in NSA surveillance, as long as they have access to equipment on which communications are transmitted or stored—such as routers, servers, cell towers, etc.
That sweeps in an enormous range of U.S. businesses that provide wifi to their customers and therefore have access to equipment on which communications transit. Barber shops, laundromats, fitness centers, hardware stores, dentist’s offices… the list goes on and on.
It also includes commercial landlords that rent out the office space where tens of millions of Americans go to work every day—offices of journalists, lawyers, nonprofits, financial advisors, health care providers, and more.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40062271

This is the bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7888/text

This is the report introducing the controversial amendment: https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/118th-congress/house-report/456

The amendment is the last item in the report, under this heading:

An Amendment To Be Offered by Representative Turner of Ohio or His Designee, Debatable for 10 Minutes

This is the transcript of the session where the amendment was discussed and voted on: https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-170/issue-63/house-section/article/H2328-1

You can find the discussion within the text using this search term:

Amendment No. 6 Offered by Mr. Turner

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 37 points 7 months ago
[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 17 points 7 months ago

Which is a massive chunk of the internet considering that the biggest providers are there. Aws, Azure, GCP, Cloudflare, etc... And the other ones are in China which is most likely not much better in that aspect.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

at least china doesnt have a history of interfering with other countries democracies.

if anything i hope this spurs some competition and more cloud providers outside these two places.

[-] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 25 points 7 months ago

China is actually much better

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 14 points 7 months ago

And the other ones are in China which is most likely not much better in that aspect

Isn't it? I don't live in china. I'm not subject to their laws. A local business is much more of a threat than a foreign one.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago

No CCP agent ever sent me a piracy notice or put me on a watchlist

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
168 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23313 readers
118 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS