418

As musicians, politicians and fans remember Sinead O’Connor, some Muslims are disappointed that the Irish singer and lifelong activist’s religious identity is not being highlighted in tributes.

UK police on Wednesday said the 56-year-old was found unresponsive in her London residence on Wednesday and that there her death was not being treated as suspicious.

Since the news of her death, Muslim fans of the 90s superstar have said her conversion to Islam, a cornerstone of her identity, was inspiring, but that some media reports have failed to note her religious beliefs in obituaries.

O’Connor, whose chart-topping hit “Nothing Compares 2 U” helped her reach global stardom, converted to Islam in 2018.

“This is to announce that I am proud to have become a Muslim. This is the natural conclusion of any intelligent theologian‘s journey. All scripture study leads to Islam. Which makes all other scriptures redundant,” the songstress tweeted on October 19, 2018.

At that time, O’Connor tweeted selfies donning the Muslim headscarf, the hijab, and uploaded a video of her reciting the Islamic call to prayer, the azan.

She took on the Muslim name Shuhada’ Davitt – later changing it to Shuhada Sadaqat – but continued to use the name Sinead O’Connor professionally.

One social media user said imagery of the singer without the hijab points to the glaring lack of Muslim reporters in newsrooms.

Meanwhile, some said that O’Connor was an inspiration for queer Muslims globally.

In 2000, she came out as a lesbian during an interview. But the singer, who was married to multiple men throughout her life, later said that her sexuality was fluid and that she did not believe in labels.

Some found joy in O’Connor’s conversion growing up, seeing themselves represented, while others, just learning about her Muslim identity at the news of her death, also took inspiration.

O’Connor was no stranger to controversy.

A lifelong nonconformist, she was outspoken about religion, feminism, and war, as well as her own addiction and mental health issues.

In 2014, she refused to play in Israel.

“Let’s just say that, on a human level, nobody with any sanity, including myself, would have anything but sympathy for the Palestinian plight. There’s not a sane person on earth who in any way sanctions what the f*** the Israeli authorities are doing,” she told Hot Press, an Irish music magazine.

Her iconic shaved head and shapeless wardrobe defied early 90s popular culture’s notions of femininity and sexuality.

In 1992, she ripped up a photo of Pope John Paul II during a television appearance on Saturday Night Live, vocal against the Catholic Church’s history of child abuse.

The late former star was also a firm supporter of a united Ireland, under which the United Kingdom would relinquish control of Northern Ireland.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're insuinating that feminism is incompatiable with women choosing what they wear if it's a garment you don't approve of. Feminism does not tell women what they can and cannot wear. Furthermore you claim its a hate image despite millions of Muslim women saying it's part of their culture and not representative of a radical minority. How many women do you intend on speaking over in your persuit of "feminism"?

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Feminism is incompatible with sexism.

Something Islam teaches as a core concept.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

Feminism is incompatible with sexism.

I've met plenty of sexist feminists.

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 3 points 1 year ago

Than they’re not feminists.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 points 1 year ago

Is a vegan who eats meat a vegan?

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

If the culture around veganism changed to that point, sure.

[-] Fylkir@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

You're insuinating that feminism is incompatiable with women choosing what they wear if it's a garment you don't approve of.

You could say the same thing about a Confederate flag though.

Not that I'm saying the two are comparable, but that it's not a very good argument.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's because that was me telling the guy I responded to how he was implying it is in any way a type of feminism to tell someone what they can't wear after he said he never said what women should wear, not an argument why feminism doesn't tell people what to wear, or why the hijab is not a hate symbol. Though I suspect you just responded to whatever sentence you could think of a counter to so it doesn't much matter.

[-] Fylkir@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I really don't understand what this run on sentence means

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

You’re insuinating that feminism is incompatiable with women choosing what they wear if it’s a garment you don’t approve of.

What I'm actually saying is that wearing a garment that has been used to terrorize and oppress thousands of women is incompatible with feminism. Most religions are incompatible with feminism since they tend to preach that women are a second class that can't hold leadership positions.

She absolutely has the right to choose what she wants to wear. She choose poorly is all. It's like showing up to a wedding as a guest and wearing a bridal gown. You don't do it.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

What I'm actually saying is that wearing a garment that has been used to terrorize and oppress thousands of women is incompatible with feminism.

Except it's not. The freedom of individuality means you actually don't have to give a fuck about the symbolism.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Does this apply to a white guy in blackface too? Or a redneck dressed in klan robes?

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

You might get the shit beat out of you, but that's your choice.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Which is EXACTLY MY POINT. It was her choice to wear a hijab - and it was a bad choice. Fuckin' hell man.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Oh come on that was not your point, your point was that the hijab is incompatible with feminism, which is wrong.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Let me say it slowly.

She has the bloody fucking right to wear a hijab if she wants to. And it is incompatible with feminism.

Both statements can be true. And both statements are true. There are women being arrested right now for not wearing the hijab. Women are being killed for not wearing a hijab. I know those are extreme cases and "not all Muslims" but they're not RARE cases and they are state supported.

Knowing that - you think wearing a hijab is perfectly aligned with feminist ideology of equality of the sexes?

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

If she was a man and wore a hijab would that be a problem?

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

"Oh you got me - if she were a man I'd think it's okay" - is that how my reply went in your head?

All else being equal - yes of course.

If a man wore a Klan or Nazi uniform I would take issue with it as well. Women can do thing that are anti-feminist. Phyllis Schlafly spoke out against 'marital rape' ffs.

"Being a woman" does not isolate you from criticism. Nor should it be the source of criticism. Supporting a religion that even in moderate mosques doesn't allow men and women to worship together and wearing an article of clothing that is literally forced on women in some regions seems antithetical to the belief that women should have equality with men.

[-] starlinguk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Muslim men must cover up down to the knee and are not allowed to shave their beards. There's "rules" for both sides. In that this is what they should do if they feel called to do so.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
418 points (84.3% liked)

World News

39104 readers
1108 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS