-25
submitted 7 months ago by ReiRose@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

This article does a great job of explaining people's frustration with having to vote for Biden again. It's long, so here are some quotes. They're totally cherry-picked, I'd recommend reading the whole thing (especially if you think the problem started with Biden, and that Clinton and Obama were ever good choices).

during the 1980s and early 1990s, fears of a relentless Republican juggernaut pressured those left of center to take a defensive stance, focusing on the immediate goal of electing Democrats to stem or slow the rightward tide.

Today, the labor movement has been largely subdued, and social activists have made their peace with neoliberalism and adjusted their horizons accordingly. Within the women’s movement, goals have shifted from practical objectives such as comparable worth and universal child care in the 1980s to celebrating appointments of individual women to public office and challenging the corporate glass ceiling.

Each election now becomes a moment of life-or-death urgency that precludes dissent or even reflection. For liberals, there is only one option in an election year, and that is to elect, at whatever cost, whichever Democrat is running. This modus operandi has tethered what remains of the left to a Democratic Party that has long since renounced its commitment to any sort of redistributive vision and imposes a willed amnesia on political debate.

I mean, you probably should vote Biden this time, because he's not all that bad, he's done some good things. And trump is so terrible, it probably will be the end of democracy and the victory of fascism if he wins. Right? But what about in two years time, or four years, or eight years?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Don't send me shit.

Did you misspell "factual information"? I gave concrete reasons for what I was saying. If that's offensive to your narrative, that's not my problem.

voters feel like they must vote for the DNC candidate despite not liking them

I think that's pretty accurate, yes. I think that's the result of the voters, by and large, having no idea what Biden actually tried to get done and got done. Are you interested in a factual discussion of, what's his record look like? Or just wanting to repeat the narrative and get mad and curse at me when it's questioned?

Fuck, it doesn't even matter how I vote because of where I live and how our broken ass voting system works.

Yeah, pretty much. If instead of shitting on the Democrats in general you'd been talking about how bad we need to reform the voting system I'd be 100% agreeing with you.

I'm sick and tired of people acting like it's the people's job to vote for whoever the Party puts forth instead of the Party being responsible for putting forth a likable candidate. That the onus lies on the voting block, whose job it is to simply cast their ballots for the DNC, instead of the DNC being any fucking bit responsible for selecting a candidate people want to vote for.

Yeah, I feel you on this. I actually do think a lot of this criticism as applied against the DNC in general is 100% accurate in terms of their neoliberal crap and not listening to the ever-growing left in this country.

On the other hand, I think that's kind of the nature of the beast -- any large, wealthy country with a lot of levers of power is going to attract a whole bunch of rich people to try to grab those levers and not do real good things with them. That applies to the Democratic establishment as it does to the Republican establishment (though not to the same degree). I don't think the answer to that though is to sit back and wait until some force comes from outside and resolves that situation and puts forth another Bernie Sanders just on its own initiative -- I think it takes people putting affirmative pressure on the system to move to the left (including yes reforming the voting system and yes a lot of activism outside of the voting system).

I honestly agree with a lot of what I think is the core of what you're saying, in terms of how badly the political machine in general in the US has betrayed the people. No one who lives in the US and looks around once in a while could think any different. I just think less engagement with the system and more cynicism about elements of it that seem to be doing good things is not the answer.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 months ago

For what it's worth, the swearing ain't at you in particular, some people just curse like sailors. And I ain't doubting the death threats, "shit" in that instance refers to "anything". And I don't wanna see it because I've seen it before. I clearly understand the existential threat that Trump and the RNC as a whole poses.

I don't think Biden is doing enough to combat that. And I think the general attitude of trying to convince the utterly insignificant number of internet leftists that Biden is good is putting a lot of effort into things that bear little fruit. I don't think there's some majority of leftist voters in any single county that could make a difference in a federal election. Many of them live in liberal strongholds and their vote for a 3rd party or a write in for Mickey Mouse won't move the needle.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't think there's some majority of leftist voters in any single county that could make a difference in a federal election.

The federal election in 2000 was decided by 537 Florida voters. That, to me, is within the realm of theoretically being possible for one single person (one volunteer doing consistent aggressive get-out-the-vote drives for example) to achieve.

Most of the time, it doesn't happen that way (and there was a ton of standard-American-system corruption that put it in the realm of being that close when Gore was by any honest standard the clear winner). But in the aggregate, those single actions can make a difference, and at least in that one example yes it was very literally that up-for-grabs. And I think in hindsight, the 2000 election was a major decision point in what the future of America was going to be in terms of response to climate change, the growth of the fascist state apparatus, economic justice for the working class, killing brown people in the middle east, things like that. I think a large amount of the suffering we're going through now -- taking all the energy away from any positive progress and forcing us to focus on just stopping the bleeding and getting back to where we were -- is continued follow-on impacts from getting Bush instead of Gore.

And, I think the 2024 election will have a much bigger impact than 2000, regardless of how hard the OP article tries to sarcastically poo poo that idea.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
-25 points (32.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
3753 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS