604
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ininewcrow@lemmy.ca to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

Everytime I look at small problems or big global problems, if you follow the money trail, it all leads to some billionaire who is either working towards increasing their wealth or protecting their wealth from decreasing.

Everything from politics, climate change, workers rights, democratic government, technology, land rights, human rights can all be rendered down to people fighting another group of people who defend the rights of a billionaire to keep their wealth or to expand their control.

If humanity got rid of or outlawed the notion of any one individual owning far too much money than they could ever possibly spend in a lifetime, we could free up so much wealth and energy to do other things like save ourselves from climate change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jochem@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Exactly. Don't hate the players, hate the game. We are too focused on finding a scape goat to see the inherit system is the problem.

[-] alilbee@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Hate both, where it's appropriate. Some of these players perpetuate the game that we all hate. Elon Musk is a player who has become part of the structure of the game, fighting regulations and damaging democracy for the sake of his own capitalistic endeavors. Someone mentioned below that Dolly Parton could be a billionaire. Not gonna hate on Dolly Parton who I assume did not come by her wealth through being an asshole, but more just being successful and our current "game" rewarding her with more than she would have in a better society. I would tax the absolute fuck out of her though.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

you know what, give each one the chance for a nice life. dolly wants a recording studio and school and whatever at her ranch? wants to run a theme park? cool, I can't imagine her community saying no.

fuckerberg wants to run a cringe mma gym under his apartment?maybe contribute a few lines to vlc or something every year (with extra review)? sure. no more than anyone should have.

shitty Jeff wants to be an aging beach himbo, maybe help people train at an outdoor gym? be my guest.

but they won't. not until you already have a gun in their mouths, and at that point, its less effort to just kill them.

[-] alilbee@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

We're looking at two extreme ends of the pole here. Zuck, Bezos, Musk are the shittiest public billionaires. There are also more secretive ones who are arguably even more destructive. These people have absolutely justified their own downfall, if it ever comes to pass. On the other side, Dolly doesn't even technically count on this list because she has given enough away to not be a billionaire. Those are the easy cases where almost every reasonable person agrees on the "right" thing to do.

Now, we have to remember that there are people who exist at every little increment along that scale of giving back to general shittiness for the global population. Focusing on the billionaires themselves and their lifestyles or whatever is not the answer. We need to focus on making effective tax brackets, effective regulations on the avenues billionaires generally target for power (political institutions, media companies, etc), and effective spending of the increased income from those new taxes to help raise the lower class to a more equitable position. That's a socdem perspective though, because I do not foresee capitalism collapsing in my lifetime and I like to be pragmatic.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

doesn't technically count

well I'm saying billionaires so we absolutely don't catch any splash damage.

what are we even arguing about?

[-] alilbee@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Not sure anybody is really arguing in this entire thread. Just discussion of edge cases and the gray areas on an interesting shower thought.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

valid. parton is an edge case, an extreme outlier, or she would be if she counted. which she doesn't.

so I feel like its a pretty good validation of the metric.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

The player are the ones writing the rules of the game. They're the ones bribing the refs.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think theres enough bitterness and hate in my heart for both. I've got too many fucking scars I never needed to have, watched too many people die for no Fucking reason.

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
604 points (89.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29525 readers
275 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS