338
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 97 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The fact that quantum dots are already being successfully applied to LCD-LED and OLED screens is encouraging for future QDEL products. QDEL stakeholders claim that the tech could bring efficiencies like lower power consumption and higher brightness than OLED. (Research using a prototype device has recorded quantum dot light-emitting diodes reaching 614,000 nits. Of course, those aren't the type of results you should expect to see in a real-life consumer product.)

614,000 nits

That's fucking insane. HDR 1400 displays are at least 1,400 nits. 614,000 nits seems like you'd be staring at the fucking sun.

There's also hope that QDEL could eventually last longer than OLED, especially since QDEL doesn't rely on organic materials that can cause burn-in.

Tbh the burn-in issue is the reason why I don't like OLEDs as computer monitors. I know phones and TVs don't tend to have major burn-in issues, but the fact that it exists sucks. TVs have a variable-enough image that long-term use isn't an issue imo, and even the most thrifty person will probably end up replacing their phone every 4~6 yrs. However, I'm used to having computer monitors be long-term things. My last monitor lasted about 10yrs before it died.

As it stands, QDEL displays would become noticeably dimmer more quickly than today's OLED displays.

Aw, that's disappointing. At the same time though, if they're able to get even 10% of the 614,000 nits on commercial units, then they'd have to lose a significant amount of brightness to dim to current display levels.

But optimists believe QDEL display lifetimes could one day be on par with LCD-LEDs and outlast OLEDs.

Yeah, I hope so too.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 57 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So the formula for nits to Lumen is below:

N=L/3.426

614,000 = L / 3.426

2,103,564 Lumens

Bruh...

1m² of the sun is 127,000 Lumen. This TV is at most 2 m². It'd certainly be the last thing you ever saw.

[-] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 61 points 6 months ago

That lab sample must have been a single diode emitting for a nanosecond or something.

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Light emitting diode -> smoke emitting diode -> flame emitting diode

[-] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Imagine playing CS2 or CoD and getting flashbanged with a screen that bright

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Reminds me of this. https://youtu.be/pq7NLMwynYg?t=56

Skit about a man who hasn't used the internet in 20 years.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/pq7NLMwynYg?t=56

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] newH0pe@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

I checked the linked paper and sadly this brightness reduced the cell lifetime from over 5000h at 100 Nits to just around 5h.

So unless they find some magic, even better chemistry this TV as bright as the sun won't happen.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 20 points 6 months ago

We will continue to wait for the holy grail of micro LED monitors and phones. So far, all of my OLED phones have burnt in around the 5 year mark. Avoiding OLED like the plague for longer lasting devices like Monitors, TVs and (god forbid) car displays.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I would assume a retail ready model would have the capacity for that blinding level of nits, but undervolt to a more reasonable brilliant 2,000 and then add voltage over time to compensate for the dimming over time.

I will say that having a >10,000 nit display could be really cool at 8k, you could produce some really awesome images and stare at the Sun without having to go outside and with less cone damage.

Apparently the Sun at noon is 1.6 billion nits, that would be hilarious in a TV.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

phones definetly have issues with burnin still. my last phone had it as well as some image degradation despite constant promising its all good now. at this point ill just stick with lcds until we have better tech.

[-] shottymcb@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

I'm posting this from a 7 year old phone with an OLED screen. The screen still looks as good as the day I bought it.

[-] ricdeh@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I cannot confirm. The phone I'm writing these very words on is a Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus from 2019 running LineageOS 20, and the AMOLED display is absolutely gorgeous and looks as good as today's top-tier smartphone screens. But maybe that's because this is a Samsung flagship, and Samsung is notorious for making kind of the absolute best displays for their flagships.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

S10e owner here, still running the stock Android. The display looks factory fresh. Battery is slightly tired but still quite functional, I just wish they'd keep sending updates.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Note 9 owner here, and there's definitely a little over the years (particularly where the status bar is), but it's usually impossible to notice. You only pick it up with a blank colour where the difference becomes more apparent.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

for reference i had a samsung a-series with an amoled display

maybe the s-series has a better panel?

I am worried about burn-in on computer screens, but at the same time I am just wondering about how others use their phones, my last 4 phones had OLED and I have never had any burn in occur. I bought a used Galaxy S4 mini at some point and when I got it had slight burn-in of some icons, but it didn't get any worse in the two years I was using it. Am I maybe just too old because I use a computer while young people use their phones for 10 hours a day?

[-] ricdeh@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

As a young person that uses their phone extensively, daily driving both a Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus from 2019 and a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra from 2024 for about 6 to 7 hours every day, I can tell you that at least for flagships, AMOLED display burn-in is a non-issue, it arguably does not exist.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

I was reading this and realized my two monitors are from over 15 years ago...

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
338 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59381 readers
1091 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS