547
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Countess425@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

I've seen lots of speculation that Trumbo is trying to get himself thrown in jail for the publicity of it all. It would result in a huge fundraising boost and conservative outrage, even if just for a short while, and no one wants to give him the satisfaction.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 year ago

Conservatives generate outrage at anything and they donate to him regardless.

This is a lame excuse for why they won’t lock his arse up.

[-] Countess425@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

His fundraising is going historically terrible right now.

[-] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I'd be curious if anyone is doing an accounting of the total take though. I get that his campaign isn't raising as much money, but how many sneakers did they sell? I'm assuming they sold a few bibles and I'd assume he has his fingers in the 2 billion Kushner took for "investments."

[-] Countess425@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You don't think he's spending any of that on his campaign or legal fees, do you? That's his money.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Call his fucking bluff.

In jail, no phone, no internet, no interviews. The only way he'd get to talk to the public is though his lawyer, who is accountable to tell the truth when discussing details of the case.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago

Fuck that. His whining gets him money already, might as well actually stick his ass behind bars.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Unsure that would happen... Lots of undecided out there who care about the rule of law and have said in polls if he was convicted they would not vote for him. I think it's delusion and wishful thinking on his part

[-] null@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

of undecided out there who care about the rule of law

Doubt.

have said in polls if he was convicted they would not vote for him

Why would you believe a group of people that are insane enough to still be "undecided" on Trump. Don't be a sucker.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

I keep saying it, those 'undecided' and 'middle of the road' people are actually just embarrassed conservatives. They don't wanna be seen as Trumpers while still voting for him.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You think everyone cares and pays attention to politics? I can introduce you to hundreds of people that I know of who don't even know who is running

[-] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Then how do they suddenly have an opinion that's based on the results of his trial? How do they even know its happening? How will they find out the verdict?

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Because the trial and the result is all over the news and will be historic if he is found guilty. That is different than politics, that is headline news.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

So they somehow missed 4 years of Trump dominating the news, yet they're dialed into the trial?

Not buying it.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I don't buy that everyone has made up their minds, and will never change them

[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Okay? That's not what I said...

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Anyways, I have a bridge to sell you.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
547 points (98.4% liked)

News

29224 readers
2434 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS