470
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 49 points 7 months ago

Maybe we should get rid of trusts over a certain dollar amount.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 38 points 7 months ago
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Nah, just tax them to hell.

They used to have a high income tax rate. Used to.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

They still do, but there are ways to either distribute the funds or set up grantor trusts that bring the rates back down to an acceptable billionaire rate. You know, next to nothing.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They used to have a high tax rate. Used to.

They still do,

Actually, they don't. (Thats a really interesting and informative link to look at.)

They used to deal with ~70%+ tax rates. Now its at ~10%, and that's before the shenanigans that you mentioned ...

but there are ways to either distribute the funds or set up grantor trusts that bring the rates back down

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We're having the same conversation but about two different things. I thought we were discussing tax rates that trusts themselves pay. Not individual tax rates.

One thing I'll correct myself on is that I just looked up trust tax rates and they're paying only 20% on capital gains now. Pretty sure that was higher before the Cheeto took over.

I used to do a whole lot of trust returns, but I'm admittedly rusty on them today.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We’re having the same conversation but about two different things.

Yeah I was speaking about the income tax rate.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

I think that's what they meant. Anything over a certain amount should go to the state.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Nah just get rid of them and the whole capitalist garbage. We’ve given it a try and it’s clearly a failed experiment.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Anytime someone worth over 100m dies, their wealth is evenly distribtluted to all citizens

[-] slurpyslop@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

but what if i, as a feudal lord, wish for my dynasty to continue unto the eons?

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

The crazy part is you could say everything after 100m gets distributed, their family still has $100m in the bank, but that wouldn't be good enough, gotta keep it all because they "earned it," whatever that means.

I personally am okay with wealth. I think millionaires are fine, especially now that everything is expensive. I want to see lines drawn at 10m, and 100m. There should be no b.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago

For serious, if an individual can’t get by on $10m (a number I pulled out of thin air) they don’t have what it takes to be in the world.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

1st. Pass a law separating company ownership from stock ownership.

2nd. 100% tax on anything over one million dollars per inheritor. With some exemptions, such as the family home.

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
470 points (95.9% liked)

News

23406 readers
1782 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS