378
submitted 5 months ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I'm certainly not defending the silencing of protest. It's just that all fascism is authoritarian, but not all authoritarianism is fascist. Fascism has a specific definition and it's a whole other degree of bad.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 11 points 5 months ago

would you be able to link to a page that helps describe fascism as you say: that relies on severity of consequence?

asking because whilst i agree that fascism is specific - and this doesn’t cover it - im not sure that degree of severity is part of the definition and that could be a dangerous precedent to set because the other parts of fascism about control and quashing dissent enable the severe consequences once they are present

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I usually go by Umberto Eco's Ur-Fascism essay for a definition.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur-Fascism

Suppression of protest would fall under #4 "Disagreement is Treason". Under fascism it is not enough to silence opposition. They must be treated as enemies of the state and be eradicated.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago

really appreciate you taking the effort! i see where you’re coming from with the “enemies of the state” part, and think that id agree there

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
378 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32242 readers
717 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS