1481
submitted 6 months ago by dystop@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Boop2133@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

My unionized company changed our mandated hours from 45 hours a week to 50 hours a week like 2 weeks after I joined it was one of the shittiest jobs I ever had. Pay was good but only because I was forced to sit there for 10 hours a day lol

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Imagine how shitty that job would have been without a union!

Unions dont make shitty jobs better, dude, get a clue.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 34 points 6 months ago

I don't think these problems should be dismissed out of hand. There is guidance out there on how to take back a shitty union.

The UAW has long been neutered with poor leadership, and sometimes leadership that gets thrown in jail for good reasons. They've recently rebuilt and are making huge gains.

https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/trampoline-unionism

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

I'm in the UAW, we used to not be able to vote on leadership. Now we can, and with a guy like Shawn Fain in the big chair I feel like we've already come a long way. I voted for him and I'll do it again.

[-] Boop2133@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

It's fine though I quit it and got a normal non union job that's incredible. Better starting pay better benefits more time off no forced OT while I can work as much OT I want. Gravy job so glad I quit.

[-] Boop2133@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Oh don't forget the matched 401K that's cool

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

One of the very few interviews in my life that I ended early was the one where in the third hour of it, they usually mentioned that the (competitive) salary was based on a 45 hour work week, with "occasional" mandatory overtime as the needs of the company dictated.

Knowing from earlier that they were very short at the position I was interviewing for, I asked for a more specific answer on what I could expect as "occasional" and the response was, "Well the work for your position has been backlogged since the previous employee quit, so for the first 3 to 6 months you can expect to work 50-60 hours each week, every week. After that, it will probably only be two weeks a month. But you can work those extra hours on the weekends too, so it's not as bad as it sounds!"

I was already done but I did some quick mental math and realized that dividing even their higher salary by that many more hours, not only was it insanely more work but was actually like a 15% pay cut, in terms of hourly rate, than the job I currently had.

I explained this to the guy and asked how much wiggle room there was on salary and he basically said something to the effect of, "Maybe in a few years you can negotiate salary, but coming in you're really in no position to argue for more pay."

So I thanked him for his time and told him the interview was over.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

They don't just need an employee, they need 2.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1481 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
92 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS