238
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Still a better company for consumers than most.

I'm saying consumers because it certainly isn't great for the forests.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

For sure, though my family members that have worked for them for a long time say the company is changing in some pretty shitty ways internally

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, I don't know much about the inside of the company. I've got some friends who've worked there and had a positive experience, but I'm in Sweden and I've no idea how things are internationally.

Edit: clarified what the thing was.

[-] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I still have a blast walking around and the build quality from most collections has been up to par if not improved on past pieces.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Definitely. The end product is getting better and better, and they're easier to build too.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Show me it surviving a moving truck ONCE and I'm sold. So VERY little Ikea gear can make it. Hemnes, Brimnes, Early Billy, Efectiv, etc.

Pine grows fast in managed forests. It's actually renewable. Bring back Pine if we can't have anything better.

[-] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The MALM line is the only one I can really vouche for. Solid stained pine queen bedframe with rolling drawers/ book shelves, TV stand, end table and a bookshelf have made it 3 houses and a few pieces are coming with me across the country in a move this month.

All together it was close to 1600$ in 2015 if I recall correctly, so not bad durability for price.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

What do you think IKEA furniture is made of? Wood!

The cheap furniture is obviously made with cheap wood but that's a given.

[-] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

And they don’t pay taxes, apparently. So yeah we’re getting cheap furniture but I do wonder if the net benefit to society would be better if they paid tax.

[-] dan@upvote.au 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Which type of taxes? Income? Property? Payroll? Something else?

If I remember correctly, all their designs are owned by a non-profit charity (that they own), and the for-profit business pays royalties to the charity. Charities aren't taxed as much as businesses, if at all.

Similarly, parts of Ikea that are in countries with high tax rates funnel their revenue to subsidiaries thay are in countries with low tax rates, as royalty payments, business expenses, etc. to shift the tax burden to the favorable country.

[-] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Here.

I should mention this link is from a tax firm almost glorifying the way that ikea has structured themselves. It’s a very charitable reading of the situation.

Just google IKEA tax, there’s tons of sources on their alleged tax evasion, including it seems claims by the EU that the Netherlands facilitates it.

I see this as corporate greed pure and simple. There is no reason people should be starving and unhoused while IKEA dodges taxes.

[-] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Pretty much everyone here in NL who is aware that would agree with you.

[-] dan@upvote.au 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I see - this is kinda what I was thinking too. I remember reading about it a while back.

from a tax firm almost glorifying the way that ikea has structured themselves. It’s a very charitable reading of the situation.

The thing is that it's likely that everything Ikea is doing is legal, so tax firms would be taking notes (after all, their goal is to ensure their customers pay as little tax as is legally allowed)

this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
238 points (95.8% liked)

News

36905 readers
641 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS