124
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
124 points (91.9% liked)
Technology
58133 readers
4487 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, cuz that's totally worth it. Nuclear reactors that mostly power laziness, porn addictions or malicious actors. Why don't you work on making the power requirements LESS instead, Sam?
Laziness, porn addiction and maliciousness have been powered by worse energy sources for over a century. But I do agree that power efficiency should be the focus before we go to the "insanely fast scale-up" phase.
I have this great plan. I call it the "final solution"
LOL okay Greenpeace.
Just keep kicking that can down the road...
How carbon dioxide is better to you is a mystery to me.
If you want the other things to stop, you'll have to kill all humans.
Like you've never heard of wind or solar? If not, best get with the rest of the world, friend.