108

submitted 5 months ago by BevelGear@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it mass and energy is equivalent no?

Yes.

And it also still baffles us as to why rest mass and resultant mass from energy should be equivalent at all?

I don't know about this one. I'm not an expert so don't quote he on it, but I don't remember hearing this before.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Then why wouldn't it exert gravitational force?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

It does, but that's the thing: It does either way. There should be no change due to the conversion of energy to mass.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Ahh, I see what you mean. Thanks for explaining it

this post was submitted on 14 May 2024

108 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13000 readers

2 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS