212
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Foreign secretary’s call comes after group releases video of British-Israeli hostage it says died after being wounded in Israeli airstrike

David Cameron has urged the BBC to describe Hamas as a terrorist organisation, reviving an accusation that the corporation shies away from a valid description of the Islamist group that is holding Israeli hostages.

The UK foreign secretary told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the organisation should reconsider its guidelines in light of a video released by Hamas showing the British-Israeli hostage Nadav Popplewell, who the group said had died in Gaza.

Hamas released a statement on Saturday saying the 51-year-old had died after being wounded in an Israeli airstrike a month ago. The video showed him with a black eye.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 6 months ago

Nobody stated that "terrorism" isn't an emotionally charged term.

It's kinda funny you're talking about weak arguments when you completely avoided the question in my comment. It seems your only justification for why Israel's (or many other government's) actions can't be labeled terrorism is "everyone else is doing it too" but that doesn't really make a difference nor does it make the label incorrect.

Ok mate. Everyone is a terrorist. How alarming.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

No a bureaucratic process does not legitimise murder it just means that "terrorism" is not the best term for this form of murder.

Why does the BBC not use this term?

Why is Cameron so keen to label Hamas as a terrorist organisation?

It's because there are emotional connotations.

If the best argument you can make requires words like "terrorist" then you don't have much of an argument.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

Literally nobody is claming that it doesn't have emotional connotations, so I don't know why you keep harping on that.

If the best argument you can make requires words like "terrorist" then you don't have much of an argument.

Not sure what argument you're talking about here. It's also not disputed that Israel has, and is continuing to, slaughter tens of thousands of civilians, including infants.

This whole thread started with someone stating that Hamas are terrorists, but if you're going to apply that to them then you also need to apply to Israel.

Goodness gracious. This is so tedious.

My original point was, and still is, calling Israel a terrorist organisation is an "appeal to emotion" - use of emotional language to bolster an argument.

There are much more appropriate ways to describe their behavior and express your disapproval.

The BBCs editorial guidelines, to which I am replying, very clearly explain why the use of the term "terrorist" is not useful.

Cameron want's BBC to call Hamas terrorists, the commenter I originally replied to said "you should also call Israel terrorists", I'm saying that if you dilute the meaning of "terrorist" sufficiently to apply to Israel it becomes meaningless, and there are more astute arguments to be made.

Here we are, n comments later, discussing how wrong I was not to express my hyperbolic disapproval for Israel's behavior.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
212 points (94.2% liked)

World News

39112 readers
1201 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS