310
submitted 5 months ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/raccoons@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago

I don't disagree with your conclusion, but I don't think they replace anything with sugar. Milk is just high in sugars, because it's supposed to give energy and nutrients to a growing calf. If you remove the fats then the sugar content is higher as a percentage.

Milk isn't all that healthy in general though. It's liquid for a calf to grow. It's much better to drink something made for human consumption and dietary needs.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Ah, you are correct. I just checked. I always thought that they added extra sugar so that it doesn't taste terrible. I know they do that with some other non-fat foods. The higher sugar content in skim and nonfat milk is because the removal of fat concentrates the remaining lactose, like you said. Thanks for correcting me!

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Good on you for being graceful about it.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
310 points (94.3% liked)

Raccoons

2209 readers
1 users here now

A place for raccoons migrating from reddit.

We are allies with the kingdoms of the opossummms, batss, and the birbs.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS