393

submitted 6 months ago by TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] firelizzard@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

Of course, but OOP is typically about putting methods on classes, inheritance of behaviour etc.

You’re referring to one subtype of OOP. That may be what most people mean when they say OOP, but that doesn’t make it correct. Object-oriented programming is programming with objects, which does not require inheritance or classes.

[-] Miaou@jlai.lu 5 points 6 months ago

With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language

[-] firelizzard@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago

So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024

393 points (94.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32601 readers

163 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml