1063
Pure light being (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by lawrence@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You don't get to take credit for that. We've been selectively breeding dogs for 30,000 years to get them to where they are today!

Cats are only sort of domesticated, and they chose to do it. Mostly they stay with us for the benefits.

[-] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

So what I'm hearing is, we Stockholm syndrome'd dogs into loving us, but cats chose to love us... So who offers the real unconditional love?

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

I think its more we've enslaved dogs and we hire cats on a freelance basis.

[-] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

I like thinking about cats as my little contract worker. We have a great relationship, but as soon as I ask him to wear a tie or show up to meetings, I very curtly and loudly am reprimanded and reminded that at the end of the day, he. is. a. contractor. and to go fuck myself

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

But they're like house elves in that they like being enslaved.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Both can, but dogs are more likely to because of the breeding. I'd say it still qualifies, since most dogs do not automatically like all humans. You'd have to disqualify a child's love that you raised as well, otherwise.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We mostly just kept them around for the benefits as well! As agriculture took off, rats and mice became a problem, so we'd let cats hang around to take care of them. This was just a few thousand years ago, vs. the tens of thousands of years of selective breeding of wolves!

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Yes, it was a mutually beneficial relationship. But while we've been breeding dogs for so long that they'll die for us, cats are much less obsequious.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

You really gotta hand it to cats - they attached themselves to the dominant species on the planet. Smart! Dogs we chose to let live with us.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

dominant species on the planet

Chickens?

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago

In the cat/human relationship, the jury is still out on which species domesticated the other...

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

We'll never know for sure, but just knowing how cats are today, I believe the hypothesis that they initiated it. The idea that people went out and brought in wild cats to keep down the rodent population doesn't seem as likely as cats going where the food is and people tolerating them because they killed the rodents (and the kittens being cute also probably helped).

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I support the theory that it was the cats who started it. They are also only partially domesticated. When humans began farming grains the rodent population near them exploded. Cats who were less timid around humans got more rodents. Humans seeing the value of having cats fed the cats during times when the rodent population was low.

If you've ever been around feral barn cats this pattern is the same today. They are constantly on the edge of being wild/domesticated.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
1063 points (96.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12619 readers
1398 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS