1053
Google Chrome’s plan to limit ad blocking extensions kicks off next week
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
1053 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
59080 readers
2232 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Is that only for Chrome or all Chromium-based browsers?
First one, then the others eventually.
Just use Firefox :)
I've used Firefox since before it was called Firefox, but just last week I hit two instances where stuff I required for work required Chrome :(
Does it "require" Chrome, or does it require a Chrome user agent? I also have one of those sites for my job, but changing the user agent for that site in FFx works flawlessly.
I've got an office that prioritizes Edge for internal apps. I've been watching the Clippy-esque intrusive Microsoft options filling up my screen space like a late-90s Yahoo toolbar.
Stuff you need for work don't usually need any ad blocking to start with so that would be good enough.
Still feels bad that I need it to be installed, and more stuff in the future could require it. They were major sites that my business works with and does not own
They don’t get money from installs. Just ads and google products usage.
If anything, only using it for sites that won't generate ad revenue costs them money.
It's not that simple.
I need very niche Chromium-based extensions for my work. They don't yet exist on Firefox. Nor any replacements to my knowledge.
They aren't ad-related, but I don't know what's going to happen to them.
I, too, am forced to use Chrome for parts of my work.
I just run Chrome for that set of tasks. Then quit, or tab to Firefox for regular browsing.
This is SOP when dealing with uglies like google, microsoft, amazon, adobe, or meta: do the toxic thing or software they require, as sandboxed as reasonable, then get back to daily life and more knowable risks.
Currently, I use Brave. Not Chrome.
I have all the benefits of Chromium-based without the Google's spyware.
I don't see myself going back and forth between 2 web browsers. I prefer choosing one that fills everything that I need, sticking with it and moving on with my life.
But since Chromium is mostly backed by Google, I don't know the long-term implications of using Chromium based.
Yeah, but that's just it, there is no one thing that fulfils all your needs if you are forced to use a particular tool, but it lacks privacy or freedom or other features.
I use chrome because I have to and also am curious and I need to know about how Google runs its shit. I run Firefox because of various features it has that are good for web development. I run Safari because it is fast and relatively private outside of the Apple ecosystem And has some great developer tools.
The effort of one keyboard twitch to move from one browser to the other is not really any amount of friction for me. It's easier than switching from one tab to another inside the same browser, so I don't get your fixation on a single tool.
And as a PS, I won't touch Brave with a 10 foot pole anymore because of their Fuckery with crypto.
Brave isn't perfect but seems to be my best option so far.
Most of the time, you can disable the 'unpleasant' stuff.
But no web browser is perfect.
Maybe Ungoogled Chromium could be good as well. But requires more tweaking and setting out of the box.
Same. I got a cheap Chromebook and a no-contract flip phone and only use google on that.
I’ll stick with Safari thank you very much. I don’t trust Firefox any more than I do Chrome. They have too much of a history of shady stuff.
OK, they asked about Chromium, though.
Switching from Chrome to Firefox is like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire.
Not even remotely
I’m really curious about why you feel that Apple is somehow less shady than Mozilla?
Different incentives. Apple makes privacy a selling point, and I’m the one paying. Who’s paying for Chrome and Firefox?
Ah right yeah I understand, thanks for explaining. I used to use Safari a lot more on Mac but I stopped recently and switched to Firefox because some websites just wouldn’t work in Safari. :/
Happy to be corrected, but as I have understood it in the past, all of them.
Both.
Yup. All the big guys will enshittify.
Luckily, there's Linux and you can use Brave or Firefox.
Isn't Brave Chromium based?
Brave is Chromium based.