782
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stufkes@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

But it's also in one's self interest to have a stable relationship with colleagues, being used to an environment, not changing things drastically so frequently.

There is a big, non-monetary cost to job hopping. If life outside of work is not stable, than changing the one constant is suddenly not appealing, even if more money is the reward.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

I found that to be the opposite. All of our clients have come to us via word of mouth and all of our initial clients were referrals from past colleagues. Because we jumped around so much we ended up with a very large network of ex colleagues that came to us for help once they knew we were available. As. those colleagues also switched jobs they knew to call us if they needed our help in their new place of employment.

They key is not to stay at one place for a long time but to make an impact during the time you spend there.

[-] stufkes@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I appreciate that it worked for you. I don't want to invalidate your experience. I just want to say that there is a good reason such a large gap exists between the evidence that job hopping is beneficial, and people actually doing it.

I want to point out that a) you have a skillset and job area that is conducive to freelancing and b) that building a network requires networking, which again is something that costs energy and social and communication skills.

These are not a given and should not be treated as a no-cost activity. Especially your last sentence implies a required focus on impact- again, your reward is more money, but there is a cost to doing this at work.

[-] Aviandelight@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This reminds me of Joan in Mad Men where she takes her Rolodex with her when she leaves the company.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

It's your Rolodex/LinkedIn, not the company's. Also, the relationship between company and employee doesn't have to be adversarial. A lot of people, and companies forget that.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It doesnt have to be adversarial, but if either party decideds to make it so, it is. For larger companies in particular its pretty much institutionalised to be adverserial from day one.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
782 points (96.1% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
19 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS