1008
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sordid@kbin.social 64 points 1 year ago

In defensive terms, no, not really. They had to build it like this because these aren't really walls per se, it's just brick lining on the outside of an earthen mound, and mounds are, well, mound-shaped. https://gomadnomad.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Bukharas-Ark-Palace.jpg

[-] BB69@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It would’ve made siege ladders harder to set up.

[-] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Who needs siege ladders when you can just climb up the damn wall?

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You’d think there’d be a reason beyond construction requirements, though—otherwise someone in the past 1,500 years would have replaced it with a more conventional wall.

[-] Sordid@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

They did. This is only the oldest, innermost fortification in the city. AFAIK additional layers of walls were build around it later.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1008 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17317 readers
45 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS