99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
99 points (95.4% liked)
Technology
58133 readers
4512 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
And boy, do I wish plastic didn't take off like that. Every new finding about how many particles slough off, and get breathed in or ingested, it makes me wish we were still using metal, wood, and glass, for packaging.
In reference to the article, I think the number one consideration is scalability of production. Producing a new material in laboratory to the tune of a few grams is a far cry from using the same process to produce tons of usable product in a factory.
Here's hoping that they can move this into an industrial process quick so we can see some benefits.
I mean... maybe? There are a host of environmental costs to those as well. Certainly, the nice thing about plastic is that its cheap to mold where as metal and wood and glass take a lot more energy to manipulate. The problem is that its too cheap, and so it gets used far in excess of its long term utility.
Sure. Which is why I'm not holding my breath. But new materials can be useful even if they aren't cheap.