350
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nope I completely made it up! Certainly Lindsey Graham will never change his stance on Ukraine, that would be a silly thing to think given his historic track record of staying on the same side of issues. I should continue reading and believing things that Lindsey Graham says

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I understand that this whole thread is just about repeating unsubstaniated bullshit about a shitty person because he's a shitty person, you don't have to keep telling me that.

I guess the difference is that I care about whether the things I'm saying are actually true, even when I'm talking about someone I personally dislike.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Oh but you and I agree. We both love defending Lindsey Graham and giving him the benefit of the doubt because he's earned it. Keep on fighting the good fight brother

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The downvoters think you're being serious. Lol!

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago

Well, but now I'm not so sure. Maybe we should start just embracing whatever things "feel true," whether or not they correspond to reality. Like, we have these facts that are supported by evidence, but what if we had, let's call them, "alternative facts." Maybe what really matters is how true something feels to us, a sort of "truthiness," if you will. If we untether ourselves from evidence, think of all the things we could say! Like, what if we said Trump was operating a sex trafficking ring in the basement of a pizza shop, and accused anyone pushing back or asking for evidence of "defending Trump?"

I call it, "Blue MAGA." I know you're all about making sure claims are based on evidence even when they're about people you don't like, but I really think you might like that idea.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

One point of clarification friend. I never said Lindsey does not support Ukraine. I said his reason for supporting anything is always self-serving, which there is mountains of evidence of. You could wave your hand and do the centrist "whatabout" all politicians being self-serving. But the fact is that Lindsey Graham is one of the most obvious modern examples of flip flopping on issues to benefit himself. If you have a counter example I'd love to read about it.

My original point is that it really doesn't matter what someone like Lindsey says or supports today, because it will change with the wind tomorrow (when he's up for election usually)

You took what I said and made a beautiful little Blue MAGA strawman out of it.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago

Right, so you're just going to gloss over all your sarcastic replies mocking me and characteristing me as "defending Graham" for pointing out that there's no evidence that his support for Ukraine is insincere.

Good talk.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Oh I get it now, you can't read :(

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

A classic finisher. Just put it at the end of any argument and declare victory, instant win, no counter, Riot plz nerf.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Do you have any evidence that's what I'm doing? I didn't declare victory. You definitely won this argument!!! I had no chance competing against such an onslaught of arguments unrelated to what I actually said to begin with. I loved the part where you made up a belief system and aspects of my personality at the same time you argued for evidence based conclusions. It really drove your point home! I understand everything clearly now

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

I didn’t declare victory. You definitely won this argument!!!

Oh, well then thank you.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

You're very welcome, I somehow forgot for some people the most important thing is to hear "you won" and not actually comprehending the conversation. With that context, your previous comments make even more sense. I didn't stand a chance

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The things you're saying are not true.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That Graham genuinely supports Ukraine.

I just noticed your username. It checks out, and everything makes sense now. Are you an AI bot?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm very confused why you think my username would indicate that I'm a bot. I am, however, entirely unsurprised that you'd make that allegation without a shred of evidence, as evidence doesn't really seem to be your thing.

I picked it because I'd recently gotten into the Ace Attorney games, and also like to ground my beliefs in evidence and expect other to as well. For a while, I was channelling Phoenix Wright's voice, as a bit, but then I got bored of it.

If I am a bot, then whoever programmed me deserves a promotion, because I think I sound very human. But I'm not really sure how I could go about proving that I'm not a bot. Let's see, punching Nazis is cool and you should do it, does that work? Ah, but maybe I'm a bot with safety restrictions turned off. Probably there's nothing I could say to prove it to you, it's utterly unfalsifiable.

At that point, how do I know you're not a bot? Maybe this whole thread full of bots! Oooooohhhhh~ spooky spooky. Can we return to reality now, please?

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You're a troll bot. AI bots can be very eloquent.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

As predicted lol.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
350 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19136 readers
4070 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS