30
submitted 5 months ago by dvdnet62@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 5 months ago

The article is basically : We have our own inferior adblockers so don't panic when UBO stops working.

[-] antler@feddit.rocks 6 points 5 months ago

Still good to have, but too bad they couldn't just piggy back off of Brave's soft fork or something and keep the functionality.

[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

For them to peggy back of a competitor work would be a bold and very risky move.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 months ago

Like everyone using an advertisement company's browser engine?

[-] Mora@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago

Too bad that Mozilla now also owns an Ad network.

[-] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 5 months ago

You're right, Firefox deserves a little blame for that. :-P

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
30 points (77.8% liked)

Technology

34909 readers
247 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS