238
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 5 months ago

Imo this law is actually in a way pushing for a porn monopoly, if you by law need to provide an id, are you gonna trust some random site with that info or the big one everyone uses

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 5 months ago

OP's claim here is just BS. PornHub is in no way a monopoly or even close. It reads like someone who has literally never searched for porn on the internet. Astroturf.

[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 23 points 5 months ago

PornHub is a monopoly. They own xnxx, redtube, xhamster, and several production companies such as brazzers. Their categorization system has also had some ranging impacts on actresses' ability to get work after they turn 22. I highly recommend listening to The Butterfly Effect by Jon Ronson.

ALSO so we're clear, I'm not a fan of this legislation because its dumb as fuck and doesn't help anyone, least of all sex workers. When people lose easy access to porn it usually results in WORSE conditions for sex workers because suddenly there's more demand in places without safety infrastructure.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 months ago

Can you define what part of PornHub owning a lot of other porn sites makes them a monopoly? Part of being a monopoly is being anticompetitive. What has PornHub done in terms of lobbying or other anticompetitive practices which makes it more difficult for a new company sharing porn to take hold? Because there is a ton of porn online which is unrelated to PornHub.

I'm all for calling out monopolies, but I legit don't see one here. I'm open to being wrong.

I don't believe that the thing about actresses getting work after 22 is reliant on PornHub. Porn has worked that way for 50+ years my dude.

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 7 points 5 months ago

Yeah I was just in Utah for business and didn't even realise there was a block. I didn't go to pornhub but all my regular sites just worked. 🤷‍♂️🍆

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

With other industries, owning 5, 10, 15 other sites might be indicative of a monopoly. But there is a metric fuckton of porn online.

Edit: pardon me, a *metric fucktonne

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 9 points 5 months ago

What's that in imperial shitloads?

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 months ago

I'm sure inflation has affected that too

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Part of being a monopoly is being anticompetitive

No it's not. Being hit with antitrust laws requires first being a monopoly, but the monopoly state exists merely by virtue of size within the industry.

Edit: to be clear the only point I am making here is in relation to that definition you provided. Nothing more.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Owning a dozen or so websites doesn't make them a monopoly when there are tens of thousands of porn sites available.

There are countless models over the age of 22 making bank in the porn industry. The only difference is that they have talent.

[-] lostwonder@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

they don't own xhamster.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
238 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
204 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS