99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 months ago

Agreed with the other commenter, there's no real reason to think the author's transphobic due to a random phrase. We as a society really need to stop organising witch hunts.

[-] Skydancer@pawb.social 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There's nothing wrong with the example in and of itself, but the word "transsexual" in place of "transgender" is not generally random. It is explicitly chosen by Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) as well as by right-wing transphobes as a dog whistle to conflate gender dysphoria with drag queens and cross-dess fetishists so as to delegitimise transpeople and suggest some sort of sexual deviance. Coupled with the equivocation of "perceived" gender, motive doesn't even have to come into it. The words themselves and the concepts they reinforce are transphobic and harmful.

A witch hunt would have been for me to say that the author is a transphobic asshole whose writings need to be wiped from the internet - which is very far from what I actually posted, which was regret for the way the language they chose distracted from the flow of their argument by reinforcing the social stigmatization of trans people. (Edit: That was a deliberate choice on my part. Not knowing enough about the author to be sure of motives and having no desire to deep dive into their history, I decided that it was only appropriate to point out the hurtful nature of the language and not imply motive.)

[-] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

It is explicitly chosen by Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) as well as by right-wing transphobes

It can also be used by people with no agenda, including most of the non-western world. Language policing is ridiculous. You want to cancel the transphobes? Stop giving them power and reclaim their terms from them.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago

Speaking as someone with a MTF close friend and NB spouse, but the term used in the article is the term everyone around me used when I was growing up. That term may be obsolete now, and if so, the author simply needs to be informed. There's no need to assume they meant harm by it.

If they knowingly used a term that may offend, then that's of course a separate issue.

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Some people just need to be offended

[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

We as a society really need to stop organising witch hunts.

Yeah, we're way too hard on bigots

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
99 points (94.6% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
78 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS