1198
submitted 3 months ago by urska@lemmy.ca to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If it was valid, do you really think people would be talking about it being a problem here? Please use your head a little.

Also, two entitely different meanings of the word signing being used here. Signing as in signing a bill vs. Cryptographic signing. Adobe has some weird "halfway" thing that's more than painting the sig on the image, but isn't gpg.

Hooray for proprietary shit becoming accepted for legal use! Yuck.

[-] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

When I worked with a lot of legal documents, we just used DocuSign mostly. Have you attempted that on Linux? Not sure what it's like these days, also curious if it's because it's a web application if it works the same.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Imagine real signed file being denied and one with painted signature accepted

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
1198 points (95.5% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
1702 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS