729

submitted 5 months ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I remember this. I also remember using scp instead. And ftp, if I go back far enough. rsync is still my friend though zfs has mostly replaced it now.

[-] BoneALisa@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

How has zfs replaced rsync for you? One is a filesystem, and the other is a filesyncing tool. Does zfs do something im not aware of lol?

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I used to use rsync to copy data from my storage array on one machine to an external and an off site backup. Since a lot of it was code, it always took forever to scan all the small files, and I had to script unlocking remote partitions.

With encrypted ZFS, I can just zfs snap then zfs send, and it does the same thing at the block level, raw, so way faster, less data transfer, and no need to send a key or passphrase unless I need to mount it at the destination (meaning a cloud provider could never know the data, for instance).

ZFS is also recursive, so if I have s/storage and /storage/stuff defined, I can snap and send either level, which makes it as versatile as rsync.