233

submitted 11 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Audalin@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

This is not to say that Jung wasn't a genius. Jung was THE BOMB DIGGIDITY (which, by the way, I wish was an official term in the Oxford dictionary).

If they love Jung so much (which I agree they should because Jung was amaaaaazing), why don't they honor him by using the spelling he actually used?

Love etymological articles with unreliable narrators.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Unreliable narrators keep us all in check, they make us question what we believe or know to be true.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024

233 points (92.1% liked)

science

19500 readers

279 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS