233
submitted 4 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago

IMHO absolute descriptivism and absolute prescriptivism are both bullshit. Language evolves, but that doesn't mean there should be no rules.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Rules definitely help keep a language more consistent! They're not without use. It also helps to teach language to children and makes established parts of a language stay more consisteny over time. However, pretending there's a rhyme or reason behind all of them is hard to justify, as well as claiming "x is correct because of rule y" if a majority decides z is correct instead.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 4 months ago

It's a bit hard to take in the present era, when the old rules were maintained by highly literate people like copy editors, and the new rules are made by anyone with a smartphone. I didn't agree with all the traditional rules, but they have an elegance and consistency that Internet discourse usually lacks.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
233 points (92.1% liked)

science

14595 readers
378 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS