1530
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GoogleSellsAds@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 months ago

Or anything Google for that matter. I see a lot of praise on Lemmy for their Pixel phones, but it wouldn't surprise me if they eventually find there was a backdoor in their firmware all this time. Yes of course, I can not prove that right now, but this news about Google Chrome isn't news for no reason. Don't trust anything Google if you care about privacy, it is literally their business model (selling targeted ads).

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago
[-] GoogleSellsAds@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

People don't hate Google as much as they should. It's cringeworthy how much they promote this ad company on this platform. They don't even realze themselves they got comprised.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Wrll you have to use a pixel phone to use graphene os

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I'm not super happy about that part, but don't really know what to do

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Use a Pixel phone. No more sketchy then any other popular phone manufacturer

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 4 months ago

It's what I do. With degoogled os. But the proprietary blobs aren't filling me with confidence.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Does your laptop run free software boot firmware? If not, it has the same issues as a phone, if not more. No smartphone runs fully free firmware.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

I know all this and that's not filling me with confidence, either. It's why Framework is in my sights.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Framework doesn't have free boot firmware either and it contains the Intel ME (the backdoor in Intel CPU's). The point I am trying to make is that you won't find a perfect solution anywhere.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 4 months ago

You're right, but I never said perfect. Perfect doesn't exist. I'm looking for reasonable and sustainable. Projects like framework and libreboot are making this possible for the first time in history. But, like you eluded to, they, too, won't be perfect.

[-] GoogleSellsAds@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Eat the ads then.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Well pretty much all computers have a backdoor to the CPU. That hasn't been proven for Pixel phones though.

[-] GoogleSellsAds@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

No, only Google has backdoors that are coming to light tome after time. Stop defending them Google ad fan boi.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Is this trolling or are you for real?

[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

I fucking hate Google and wouldn't use any of their (proprietary) software, but Pixel phones are amazing. Hear me out, Google is the only phone manufacturer right now, that puts extensive hardware security features like MTE, a secure element, as well as a bunch of others in their phones. The Google Titan M2 is based on an open-source project called OpenTitan, and Google has even contributed their own changes upstream. It's based on the open RISC-V architecture, and it's the most complete and secure implementation of a secure element that you can find in an Android phone. The only thing that comes even close is the "Secure Enclave" in Apple ARM chips, that are used in modern iPhones, iPads and Macs. I understand the concern about a potential backdoor in the firmware, but that's a valid concern with basically every CPU on the market right now. x86 are ARM are completely proprietary, so you can't really trust any CPU based on one of these architectures. The old Google Titan M1 was based on ARM, Apple's Secure Enclave is also based on ARM, as well as Snapdragon's SPU (which is incomplete and insecure anyway). The Titan M2, being based on open hardware architecture and firmware, is the most trustworthy secure element, despite being made by Google. It includes features like Insider Attack Resistance, support for the Weaver API, Android StrongBox hardware keystore implementation and is used for a secure implementation of Android Verified Boot. GrapheneOS is free, open-source, and doesn't use any proprietary Google apps/services by default. Although I hate Google, a Pixel with GrapheneOS is currently the best option for a secure smartphone.

[-] GoogleSellsAds@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

Google fan boy. Good luck promoting that shitty ad company.

[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Ah yes, definitely promoting Google

I fucking hate Google and wouldn't use any of their (proprietary) software

I hope you realize how dumb your comment is

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
1530 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59670 readers
1629 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS