336

It’s vitally important that Democrats now ask one question and one question only: Does Biden have the best chance of beating Trump, or is there someone else readily available who has a better chance? (robertreich.substack.com)

submitted 5 months ago by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/politics@lemmy.world

318 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

Vote blue no matter who died quickly I guess.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Those people are still voting blue. The issue is getting everyone else on board. "Vote blue no matter who" can't carry the election entirely on its own and never could. 2020 was won on razor margins.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

We need to get rid of the electoral college.

Biden beat Trump by 7 million votes. That it was "razor thin" is because of the electoral college.

Hillary lost to Trump despite winning the popular vote by 3 million because of the electoral college.

Gore lost because of Florida's electoral college (and all the fuckery there) despite winning the popular vote by 0.5million.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago

Small correction: after numerous recounts, it was proven decidedly that Gore had won in FL. However, the corrupt Supreme Court decided that since the media (Fox News) had already called the election for Dubya, that it would pose too much risk to our democratic process to overturn the results to the correct outcome.

This is most amusing given the context of Jan 6 and the corrupt court’s opinions on that matter, but here we are.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I strongly agree with you but that's not going to change the fact that we still have to contend with the EC this election cycle.

Edit: also gore didn't lose by either metric he just didn't stick it out for the recount

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It would be enough to make an amendment so that the shape of electoral districts must be convex. This would make gerrymandering impossible.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

How do you actually fit together exclusively convex shapes?

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024

336 points (83.9% liked)

politics

19237 readers

1266 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News