970

Las Vegas' dystopia-sphere, powered by 150 Nvidia GPUs and drawing up to 28,000,000 watts, is both a testament to the hubris of humanity and an admittedly impressive technical feat | PC Gamer (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 4 months ago by filister@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

441 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] gianni@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

We need more nuclear power ASAP

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There's no such thing as "ASAP" for nuclear power. If you had the permits signed off today, it would take 10 years before a single GWh of new nuclear energy goes to the grid.

Instead, maybe we shouldn't build giant spherical advertising displays?

[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

There's no such thing as "ASAP" for nuclear power

Sure there is. It's just that the P stands for "20 years from now."

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Vegas is almost entirely powered by the hoover dam. It's already pretty green as far as energy goes. The question will be where do they get their power from in a few years when lake mead dries up.

[-] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago

That's not true. The Hoover Dam contributes to Vegas's power supply, but it's nowhere near "almost entirely powered" by the dam, except in Fallout: New Vegas.

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Turns out you're correct. I appreciate the correction.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Fallout: New Vegas is powered by my ever dwindling sanity. I am currently trying to get my mods to play nice.

Also its implied ingame that only the strip is powered by the damn dam and that Freeside and West Vegas get either limited or no power, hence why directing the electricity from Helios One to the area is such a big deal.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

In addition to the other thing, dams have a dramatic and disastrous impact on the ecology in the immediate area and the entire riparian system they connect to. It's "green" in terms of emissions but they're still harmful and we should be phasing them out for lower impact alternatives as much as possible.

[-] rogue_scholar@eviltoast.org 3 points 4 months ago

Should? Definitely, but let's be realistic, we can barely get people off of coal and oil right now.

In the world we live in, Dams have some of the lowest environmental impact compared to the other places we get our energy.

So we probably shouldn't be trying to phase them out while there are much more severe effects being felt from the other base load facilities.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024

970 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59598 readers

3602 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS